As the technology is progressing and people all over the globe have the access to the online world, the number of online traders is also rising with time. For every field of study and interest there is large availability of books not only in libraries or at shops but these days there is an easy access to e-books. But there is something that goes beyond grids and model numerics. A regional version of MPAS can be created and eventually replace the current regional model favored by the academic community, WRF, which was also developed at NCAR. The other, FV-3, will continue and deepen National Weather Service isolation from the US academic community and continued mediocrity in global weather prediction. Even today, they have no rational, organized way to encourage and reap the benefits of academic community research. The Arctic Oscillation (AO) is an intraseasonal oscillation, in contrast to pretty much all of the oscillations we have analyzed so far.

MPAS uses a superior grid structure (the “C” grid) that will produce far better high-resolution predictions than the problematic “D” grid of FV-3. And MPAS’ superior numerics offer better inherent resolution for a particular grid spacing, so one can run with coarser grids than FV-3 and secure equally good results (which reduces computer demands). A few items will, of course, fare better compared to others. 8. Until last year, the National Weather Service had starkly inferior computing resources compared to ECMWF, UKMET, and other major centers. Today, the National Weather Service has first class computing and Congress wants to keep it that way. The National Weather Service has the computing power to push forward rapidly and innovate, if it has the will to do so. Rabbits do well both indoors and outdoors, but they cannot handle certain weather extremes. In fact, GFS physics doesn’t work well at any resolution. Replace the old SAS convective scheme as well.

Update the model microphysics (moist physics) parameterization to something modern, like the well-regarded Thompson scheme used in WRF. NWS research dollars could then help support global model research efforts that benefit both the operational and research communities. The isolation of NWS global prediction efforts would end. By picking MPAS, the National Weather Service will combine efforts with the huge US atmospheric sciences research community, with that community’s model innovations (including physics and data assimilation) flowing into the National Weather Service. In contrast, the less innovative FV-3 model was developed by a small group in NOAA/GFDL with little experience in outreach and interaction with the university/research community. I disappointed by a NOAA presentation this morning regarding testing between the two global model finalists: the NOAA/GFDL FV3 and the NCAR MPAS. MPAS uses an innovative geometry (hexagonal grid) that solves age-old model problems at the poles, while FV-3 uses a more traditional grid geometry.

Online websites can help you find out timely weather forecasts so that you can make an informed decision while planning your trip. The final decision on the future NWS global model will be made by Dr. Louis Uccellini, head of the National Weather Service. Recently, they began a process to acquire their next generation global model (called NGGPS, Next Generation Global Prediction System), something I will talk more about below. This will greatly improve US data assimilation and probabilistic prediction. TAMDAR data on short-haul aircraft, collected by Panasonic, can enhance the quality of forecasts. Many of the proteins included in the whole genome data sets from GenBank cannot be found in SWISS‐PROT. Having this type of weather information—called subseasonal forecasts—in the hands of the public and emergency managers can provide the critical lead time necessary to prepare for natural hazards like heat waves or the next polar vortex. As demonstrated by Panasonic, there are steps that the National Weather Service can take during the next six months to rapidly improve US global weather prediction. Or any weather prediction. For too long, the National Weather Service has developed it models in a disorganized ad-hoc way, in isolation from the US research community.

7. Other major centers have entrained the help of the research community in an effective way. The winter weather. First off, check out in the Internet: you have the easiest and the quickest way to search the winter weather in the city you plan on visiting. They have learned the hard way that one can not do state-of-the-art weather prediction development and operations that way. 4. Work with the rest of the atmospheric science community (academia, private sector) to develop a detailed strategic plan for US numerical weather prediction and follow it. If not, the way you are currently predicting and monitoring weather threats may not be as sophisticated as you think – or as accurate as you need to stay safe. They may reveal when you will reunite with an ex-lover, achieve greater wealth or when to expect a more exciting career. They would rather the model errs on the side of caution as it is more cost effective to do a maintenance checkup in response to a false prediction rather than a full blown shutdown. 5. Rework the structure and personnel of EMC, NCEP and NOAA labs to build coherent teams to work on key model issues (such as physics).